Dogs have prominent ones
Crossword Clue

  • We have found 17 answers to crossword clue "Dogs have prominent ones"
  • The Best Answer: 10/10
AnswerCrossword Clue
CANINETEETHDogs have prominent ones
ROMANNOSESThey have prominent bridges
SHOEIt may have a prominent tongue
featuringHave as a prominent attribute or aspect
featuredHave as a prominent attribute or aspect
PAWSDogs have four
TOESMost dogs have 18
RATTERSCats and dogs Hamelin could have used
fissipedany member of the suborder Fissipedia, carnivorous mammals that have separate toes, as bears, badgers, dogs, cats, and raccoons
vizslaany of a breed of hunting dogs of Hungarian origin that resemble the Weimaraner but have a rich deep red coat and brown eyes
collieany of a breed of large dogs developed in Scotland that occur in rough-coated and smooth-coated varieties and have erect ears and a long muzzle
borzoiany of a breed of large dogs developed in Russia especially for pursuing wolves that have a long silky usually white coat with darker markings called also Russian wolfhound
samoyedsone of a Russian breed of medium-sized dogs that have long, dense, white or cream hair and are used by the Samoyed people for herding reindeer and pulling sleds
samoyedone of a Russian breed of medium-sized dogs that have long, dense, white or cream hair and are used by the Samoyed people for herding reindeer and pulling sleds
apsoany of a Tibetan breed of small dogs that have a dense coat of long hard straight hair, a heavy fall over the eyes, heavy whiskers and beard, and a well-feathered tail curled over the back called also Lhasa
syllogismAn instance of a form of reasoning in which a conclusion is drawn (whether validly or not) from two given or assumed propositions (premises), each of which shares a term with the conclusion, and shares a common or middle term not present in the conclusion (e.g., all dogs are animals; all animals have four legs; therefore all dogs have four legs)
syllogismsAn instance of a form of reasoning in which a conclusion is drawn (whether validly or not) from two given or assumed propositions (premises), each of which shares a term with the conclusion, and shares a common or middle term not present in the conclusion (e.g., all dogs are animals; all animals have four legs; therefore all dogs have four legs)