Have breakfast e g in Germany
Crossword Clue

  • We have found 12 answers to crossword clue "Have breakfast e g in Germany"
  • The Best Answer: 10/10
AnswerCrossword Clue
ESSENHave breakfast, e.g., in Germany
paperbarksUsed in names of other trees that have a peeling papery bark, e.g., paperbark maple, paperbark birch
paperbarkUsed in names of other trees that have a peeling papery bark, e.g., paperbark maple, paperbark birch
semipalmatedUsed in names of wading birds that have toes webbed for part of their length, e.g., semipalmated sandpiper
glucocorticoidsAny of a group of corticosteroids (e.g., hydrocortisone) that are involved in the metabolism of carbohydrates, proteins, and fats and have anti-inflammatory activity
glucocorticoidAny of a group of corticosteroids (e.g., hydrocortisone) that are involved in the metabolism of carbohydrates, proteins, and fats and have anti-inflammatory activity
pepperUsed in names of other plants that are related to this, have hot-tasting leaves, or have fruits used as a pungent spice, e.g., water pepper
peppersUsed in names of other plants that are related to this, have hot-tasting leaves, or have fruits used as a pungent spice, e.g., water pepper
appositionA relationship between two or more words or phrases in which the two units are grammatically parallel and have the same referent (e.g., my friend Sue; the first U.S. President, George Washington
appositionsA relationship between two or more words or phrases in which the two units are grammatically parallel and have the same referent (e.g., my friend Sue; the first U.S. President, George Washington
syllogismAn instance of a form of reasoning in which a conclusion is drawn (whether validly or not) from two given or assumed propositions (premises), each of which shares a term with the conclusion, and shares a common or middle term not present in the conclusion (e.g., all dogs are animals; all animals have four legs; therefore all dogs have four legs)
syllogismsAn instance of a form of reasoning in which a conclusion is drawn (whether validly or not) from two given or assumed propositions (premises), each of which shares a term with the conclusion, and shares a common or middle term not present in the conclusion (e.g., all dogs are animals; all animals have four legs; therefore all dogs have four legs)